Making An Offer To Buy A Business – 6 Key Considerations

5/5 - (1210 votes)

Clients also ask:

In more uncomplicated terms, an interim manager is a highly experienced and specialized manager whom you can employ for a short time to solve a specific business problem. He or she is a master project manager who will not only give you advice but also 

Company Formation in Russia

An Interim is hired to do the best for the business with no disguised agenda. Interim Managers carry customized models/project management frameworks that are tailored to individual business needs. Interim Managers offer cost-effective solutions and usually at half the day rate of traditional consulting houses.

Open a company in Russia with

Tax namePercent %Date:
Corporate Tax Rate20.00Dec 2021
Personal Income Tax Rate13.00Dec 2021
Sales Tax Rate20.00Dec 2021
Social Security Rate30.00Dec 2021
Social Security Rate For Companies30.00Dec 2021
Social Security Rate For Employees0.00Dec 2021

10 Steps to Open a Company in Russia – read more in Articles

An interim CEO is an individual selected by a company’s board of directors to take the role of the chief executive officer during a time of transition or as the effect of the sudden release of the company’s previous CEO

How to start a business in Russia – read more in Articles

We cover every aspect of buying and selling small businesses in Russia.

There is a lot to keep in mind when making an offer on a business for sale. It can be a scary thought for first-time buyers. 

Before we get into some of the elements to consider, the one thing you absolutely must train yourself to do is to make offers. That is what shifts the whole business buying process into overdrive.

It is the only certain way to know exactly what the seller is thinking, what their “hot buttons” perhaps, and where they are willing to disclose.

It is also an exciting time and a fantastic learning experience if you are new to this strategy.

It’s Hard To Retract The Written Word

It is always preferable to have as many calls/meetings as possible with the seller before an offer. 

You need to get a very good sense of the business, how it works, its challenges, the seller’s role, why they are selling, and if there are any obvious red flags such as customer concentration. 

The goal is to get to know them/the business, address as many questions as possible, and understand their valuation rationale and deal terms so that you do not go into the offer blindly or waste timetabling offers on a business that does not make sense to purchase.

Additionally, there are some points where you may want to take the seller’s temperature and gauge their reaction and any negation before drafting language that can turn the deal south or may be interpreted incorrectly.

The hard items are better addressed orally since it is difficult to retract what has been documented if, for example, the seller does not understand the language, or disagrees strongly. 

A written offer cannot replace face-to-face discussions.

Once a written offer is presented, and goodness knows many attorneys can make a complete mess out of a simple point, you want to avoid having to undo what the attorney created or anything sensitive they added that you did not discuss to some extent with the seller. 

No matter how new you may be to this process, make sure you understand every point that the attorney has drafted so that you can explain it. 

The reason is, that it is far better for you to arrange directly with the seller and/or their intermediary than through attorneys at least initially. 

Lawyers have their roles, but early in the process, you should establish an amicable connection with the other side.

It’s YOUR Offer

In most deals, the buyer takes a vast amount of the risk. 

It is that simple. 

Given that, you can ask for anything you want. 

It is your money, your future, and your risk. Whatever you need to feel confident in the offer and terms that will allow you to close the deal, then include them. 

The seller may not share the same view but that is their choice.

For example, if you calculate a valuation that is far below what they are asking, but your methodology is sound, then present it. 

Do not worry about insulting them – go ahead; insult them. 

Sometimes sellers need a good blast of reality oxygen.

Letter of Intent (LOI) Or Full Purchase Agreement

In smaller deals, the LOI step may be bypassed in favor of a full-blown Definitive Purchase Agreement (DPA) and that strategy has its place. However, in larger deals, an LOI or even an IOI (Indication of Interest – wow the fancy finance people sure know how to come up with wild acronyms) may be the first step.

We will focus on lower to mid-level deals and why an LOI is an effective tool in all but the most simple and smallest dealings. 

An LOI is an excellent vehicle to get the dialogue going and manage key issues while avoiding getting bogged down in the minutia ingrained with the more comprehensive DPA which can easily cause a deal to grind to a halt prematurely. The LOI spells out valuation, terms, financing, what is expected from the owner post-sale, the overview of the due diligence process, an exclusivity period for the buyers, and a target closing date.

It is also a great tool to lock up a business in a non-binding format, so it is off-limits to other buyer prospects. Before a buyer spends a lot of money on attorney fees, the LOI can serve to indicate the key unrestricted terms and allow them sufficient time to underwrite the deal while working on a Definitive Purchase Agreement.

Forget The “We Have Other Offers” Tactic

Good companies go under contract quickly. 

That is why you want to do your preliminary research efficiently. Nevertheless, do not let the possibility of a competing offer cloud your judgment. Intermediaries commonly use the age-old tactic of telling buyers there are other offers to accelerate getting their offer. While it may be true, forget about it. That tactic is the brokerage version of the car salesman telling you “I’ll speak to my manager and see what I can do”.

If a seller/intermediary gets aggressive with this strategy, tell them they may want to go ahead with the other offer, and if it doesn’t work out let you know. You will likely see how quickly they will retreat. If they don’t, then you know there may be truth to their comments, and you can then decide whether or not to expedite your offer.

Hurry Up and Wait

Once you determine that a company is of interest to you and you want to make an offer; get it done fast. Not recklessly, but quickly. 

Work with your team to get the key points into place and submit the offer with a short, but reasonable expiration (i.e. 5 working days). 

Then…wait. Do nothing. Zero. No calls to the other side…nothing.

If they contact you for clarification of any points or to respond before the great deadline. But if they do not – you do nothing until the expiration. The last thing a buyer wants to do is to come across as over-excited. 

So, work quickly to get your offer submitted, then chill out until the other side responds.

Think Before You Set “Deal Breakers”

As someone who has been involved in all facets of the M & A world – as a buyer, seller, investment banker/broker, I cannot even tell you how many times when one party has said “that’s a deal-breaker for me”, they end up changing their mind. By doing so, they lose all credibility and negotiating leverage.

If something truly is a deal-breaker and a line in the sand for you, that is fine, but stick to it. Better yet, try to avoid deal breakers. Be a deal maker. Be open-minded. Find solutions. There is always another way. Be creative. Before you take a tough stance, take an open-minded one. Be reasonable. 

Ego usually gets in the way of negotiations when one side focuses more on winning the point rather than comprehending it or exploring other options. 

Besides, if you can budge a bit on an item that you have made clear is critical for you, then you can leverage that to get a significant concession in return.

Get help starting your business.

You may also like

The government will simplify the purchase of businesses leaving the Russian Federation

Russian business will get the right to purchase foreign companies that intend to leave the Russian market. The measures are aimed at adapting the Russian economy and preserving jobs. The government has approved 14 new measures to maintain the stability of the Russian economy in the face of sanctions. The main goal is to…

Continue Reading The government will simplify the purchase of businesses leaving the Russian Federation

Avoiding “Entire Fairness” Review in Claims against SPAC Boards through Corwin

Special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”) business combinations have provided a novel and difficult context to apply traditional fiduciary duty doctrines in Delaware law. Recently, in In re MultiPlan Corp. Stockholders Litigation, the Delaware Chancery Court issued a ruling denying a motion to dismiss breach of fiduciary duty claims brought against a SPAC’s fiduciaries in…

Continue Reading Avoiding “Entire Fairness” Review in Claims against SPAC Boards through Corwin

Senators are considering a bill on a new procedure for managing external business

The State Duma adopted in the first reading a bill on the management procedure in foreign companies, where the share of foreign business is more than 25 percent. It is permissible to introduce external management only in companies that intend to leave the Russian market. External administration can be introduced only in socially significant…

Continue Reading Senators are considering a bill on a new procedure for managing external business

Features of the consideration of corporate disputes. How to resolve disagreements in pre-trial and judicial proceedings?

Contents: A corporate dispute is a disagreement arising within a certain company and related to its creation, management, reorganization, profit distribution or liquidation. A conflict may arise between shareholders, legal entities, sole proprietors, commercial and non-profit organizations, as well as affect the interests of small firms and large-scale corporations.  Due to the fact that…

Continue Reading Features of the consideration of corporate disputes. How to resolve disagreements in pre-trial and judicial proceedings?

Chancery Court Accepts “Novel Theory” of Liability for Directors

In Garfield v. Allen (May 24, 2022), the Delaware Court of Chancery accepted, “with admitted trepidation,” what it called a “novel theory” advanced by the plaintiff—namely, that a corporation’s directors may have breached their fiduciary duties to the stockholders by failing to reverse equity compensation awards made to the CEO after the board became…

Continue Reading Chancery Court Accepts “Novel Theory” of Liability for Directors

Integration at Tiffany’s | M&A Leadership Council

  7 Key Integration Initiatives and Objectives to ConsiderBy Mark Herndon, Chairman of M&A Leadership Council The acquisition of Tiffany & Co. (TIF) by LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton (LVMH) was not technically a hostile takeover, but given the outright insults, threats, lawsuits, back-channel dealings, and portended government intervention – it certainly could not…

Continue Reading Integration at Tiffany’s | M&A Leadership Council

Related searches:

Services of Russian lawyers in Russia and UAE

Making An Offer To Buy A Business - 6 Key Considerations
Service Type
Making An Offer To Buy A Business - 6 Key Considerations
Provider Name
Russian lawyers,
Presnenskaya Nab. 6, bld. 2, Imperia Tower. ,123112, Moscow, ,Moscow-123112,
Telephone No.+7 (967) 170-68-30
Making An Offer To Buy A Business - 6 Key Considerations
When setting up a business entity in Russia, you will need to do some analysis to determine which business system will be the most advantageous for your company. A joint-stock company (JSC) may supply you with the ownership and revenue opportunities you need for a successful business venture in Russia. Under the Russian Civil Code, a JSC provides rights with limited liability. Shareholders of a JSC are not generally liable for its debts and their risk is limited to their acquisition. Shareholders may sign shareholders’ agreements that control how their rights are exercised.